Author： Scott Ian Fuller Ian Gaskin Steve
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 1466-1845
Source： Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol.30, Iss.1, 2006-03, pp. : 161-171
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Internationally, fieldwork is seen as intrinsic to geographical education. Fieldwork is here defined as any study of the environment that takes place outside the classroom. This paper extends a previous study of student perceptions of the impacts on their learning of a cancellation of fieldwork caused by an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in the UK countryside (Fuller et al. , 2003). This paper examines the same issue from the viewpoint of the students' lecturers, who were interviewed to discover their perceptions of the value of fieldwork as a pedagogic device. Textual analyses of transcripts suggest that the lecturers' main objectives for fieldwork are to put theory into context and to teach students subject-specific skills. The development of transferable skills is a secondary benefit. Fieldwork, while considered a vital teaching and learning tool, is not central to geography and environmental science education, which emphasizes the understanding and contextualization of subject theory, but more needs to be done to integrate fieldwork into pedagogic strategies.
Related content
By FULLER IAN GASKIN STEVE SCOTT IAN
Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 27, Iss. 1, 2003-03 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
