Author： Trébucq Stéphane
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 1466-4275
Source： Accounting, Business & Financial History, Vol.17, Iss.2, 2007-07, pp. : 313-332
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The case of a French merger can be used to better understand the nature of conflicts of interest and cognitive conflicts between accountants, shareholders, lawyers and judges. This is especially the case when exchange ratios are unfairly established. When caught in a situation of asymmetric information, minority shareholders try to obtain more information about the auditors' report through judicial proceedings. The financial knowledge possessed by the judge then becomes a necessary condition for shareholders to be protected.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
SourceOECD Industry, Services & Trade, Vol. 2011, Iss. 21, 2011-09 ,pp. :
International Commerce Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2008-11 ,pp. :