

Author: Ozkan Aydin
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1466-4305
Source: Applied Financial Economics, Vol.12, Iss.1, 2002-01, pp. : 19-24
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper investigates the empirical determinants of corporate debt maturity structure. This is done by testing several leading theoretical models of debt maturity structure using a cross-sectional data set of 321 non-financial UK firms. The evidence lends considerable support to the prediction that the impact of firm size on debt maturity is positive. The findings also provide support for the notion that firms match the maturity structure of their debt to that of their assets. The findings reveal that agency-related costs and volatility of firm value exert a negative impact on debt maturity. The empirical analysis provides no evidence that taxes affect debt maturity structure. Finally, the empirical analysis is not supportive of the signalling hypothesis that firms use their debt maturity structure to signal information to the market.
Related content






THE RESPONSE OF FIRMS' LEVERAGE TO RISK: EVIDENCE FROM UK PUBLIC
By CAGLAYAN MUSTAFA RASHID ABDUL
Economic Inquiry, Vol. 52, Iss. 1, 2014-01 ,pp. :

