Why is group-based pay perceived as meaningful, meaningless or negative? Exploring the meanings of pay suggested by reflection theory

Author： Hakonen Anu   Maaniemi Johanna   Hakanen Jari Juhani  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1466-4399

Source： International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.22, Iss.10, 2011-06, pp. : 2245-2261

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Managers generating meaning for pay: A test for reflection theory

By Salimäki Aino   Hakonen Anu   Heneman Robert L.  

Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 24, Iss. 2, 2009-02 ,pp. : 161-177

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why it pays to pay attention to people

By  

Human Resource Management International Digest, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 1997-01 ,pp. : 12-14

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Performance-based pay systems for teams: explaining the design of performance-based pay systems for teams from an expanded agency theory perspective

By Mitlacher Lars W.   Paul Christopher  

International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 2009-04 ,pp. : 171-186

Inderscience Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Exploring Lawler's new pay theory through the case of Finbank's reward strategy for managers

By Lewis Philip  

Personnel Review, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 2000-01 ,pp. : 10-32

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

CEO pay as a reflection of power or performance: an empirical test for The Netherlands, 2002-2006

By Laan Gerwin Van der  

Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2010-01 ,pp. : 157-173

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite