Author： Earl Jennifer Kimport Katrina
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 1468-4462
Source： Information, Communication and Society, Vol.11, Iss.4, 2008-06, pp. : 449-472
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
A major debate has erupted in recent work on social movements about the role of the state in protest, with some advocating alternative approaches to the study of social movements, such as a focus on institutional authorities. Using data on four types of online protest (petitions, boycotts, and letter-writing and email campaigns), acquired using an innovative new methodology that produces a generalizable sample of online protest actions, this paper addresses this debate. While the state is a frequent target of online protest, a significant portion of protest activity targets other institutional authorities. The authors' analyses disaggregate the state and distinguish between types of institutional authorities, further deepening the understanding of both state and non-state actors. Their data also suggest an association between tactical forms and their targets. Finally, by using Internet data, this paper contributes to an under-studied area of social movement research: online protest.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Information, Communication and Society, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, 2012-05 ,pp. :
FROM MEDIA POLITICS TO E-PROTEST
Information, Communication and Society, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2000-06 ,pp. :