

Author: Burnard Pamela White Julie
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-3518
Source: British Educational Research Journal, Vol.34, Iss.5, 2008-10, pp. : 667-682
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This article explores the complex interplay of power between performativity and creativity agendas—a mutual tension that resides in British and Australian education. Accountability constraints and conflicting policy debates are problematised against the wider imperatives of similar government agendas. This 'counterpoint' of freedom and control has significant implications for pedagogy and, through accommodating performativity, teacher agency and professionalism are under threat. The authors propose a 'rebalancing' where pedagogy transforms from a site of struggle for control, to one where a higher trust is placed in teacher professionalism. The idea of 'rebalancing pedagogy' offers a way for teachers to navigate and be supported through the opposing demands of performativity and creativity. It acknowledges the importance of teacher agency and where teaching is judged against the characteristics of a systemic approach that facilitates the building of creative learning communities capable of supporting any curricula or content-focused programmes in and beyond schools.
Related content




Creativity and performativity: the case of further education
British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2008-10 ,pp. :


The Boundlessness of Performativity in Elite Australian Schools
By Meadmore Daphne Meadmore Peter
Discourse, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, 2004-01 ,pp. :


Creativity and performativity policies in primary school cultures
By Troman Geoff Jeffrey Bob Raggl Andrea
Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 22, Iss. 5, 2007-09 ,pp. :


Creativity: performativity’s poison or its antidote?
By Munday Ian
Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 44, Iss. 3, 2014-07 ,pp. :