![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Author: Hill Jonathan
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-3526
Source: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol.19, Iss.1, 2011-01, pp. : 47-77
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Missing Premise in the Ontological Argument
Religious Studies, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, 1973-09 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Sceptical theism and a lying God: Wielenberg's argument defended and developed
Religious Studies, Vol. 51, Iss. 1, 2014-07 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Why the New Missing Explanation Argument Fails, Too
Erkenntnis, Vol. 64, Iss. 2, 2006-03 ,pp. :