

Author: Nachtomy Ohad
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-3526
Source: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol.20, Iss.5, 2012-09, pp. : 953-972
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper examines the Leibnizian background to Kant's critique of the ontological argument. I present Kant's claim that existence is not a real predicate, already formulated in his pre-critical essay of 1673, as a generalization of Leibniz's reasoning regarding the existence of created things. The first section studies Leibniz's equivocations on the notion of existence and shows that he employs two distinct notions of existence – one for God and another for created substances. The second section examines Kant's position in his early paper of 1763. My claim is that Kant's view of existence in 1763, namely that it is not a predicate, is strongly related to the logical notion of possibility, formulated by Leibniz and accepted by Kant.
Related content


Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence
Religious Studies, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 1996-03 ,pp. :


Kant on the Possibility of Ugliness
By Cohen Alix
British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 53, Iss. 2, 2013-04 ,pp. :




By Abaci Uygar
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2008-08 ,pp. :


Frege, Pünjer, and Kant on Existence
Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol. 82, Iss. 1, 2011-07 ,pp. :