Author: Westerman Marni Huey Laura
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-3739
Source: Discourse, Vol.33, Iss.2, 2012-05, pp. : 223-234
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Nancy Fraser's propositions regarding the nature of ‘boundary’ work carried out by experts within organizations suggests that individuals who work within bureaucratic structures are so constrained by the institutional context that they become detached, depoliticizing arbitrators of politicized claims. The purpose of the research reported in this article is to examine the assertion that workers in boundary roles necessarily engage only in work that depoliticizes the claims of oppositional social groups. By exploring the work of anti-harassment practitioners at Canadian universities, we uncover moments of both constraint and liberation in the practitioners’ work roles. Attending to the complexities of boundary role work illustrates that struggles over the definition of needs and claims made by marginalized social groups are not closed, nor are boundary workers completely co-opted by bureaucratic institutional prerogatives. Although variously constrained, interviews with practitioners reveal that their work can support counter-hegemonic challenges to the
Related content
Thailand: The Roles of Educational Institutes Towards HIV/AIDS
Prospects, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, 2002-06 ,pp. :
Education + Training, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, 1993-12 ,pp. :