The magnetic importance of a prenup in the paradigm case Crossley v Crossley [2008] 1 FCR 323

ISSN： 1469-9621

Source： Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol.30, Iss.3, 2008-09, pp. : 233-241

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

In Re S and In Re W [2002] UKHL 10, [2002] 1 FCR 577

By Laing Judith

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, 2003-02 ,pp. : 69-82

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Case C-303/06 Coleman v. Attridge Law and Steve Law Judgment of the ECJ 17 July 2008; Judgment of the Employment Tribunal, London, 30 September 2008

By Hervey Tamara Reeves Maddy Rodgers Hannah Riding Ben Roberts Tom

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 31, Iss. 3, 2009-09 ,pp. : 309-319

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Case Law of the European Union Courts: Leading Judgments 1 December 2007 to 29 February 2008

By Engström Johanna

ERA Forum, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2008-07 ,pp. : 327-349

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Notwendigkeit einer richtlinienkonformen Bestimmung der Leistung in § 323 V BGB bei Teilschlechtleistung und Teilleistung

By Müller Markus

Archiv fuer die civilistische Praxis, Vol. 204, Iss. 5, 2004-10 ,pp. : 732-756

Mohr Siebeck

Access to resources Recommend Favorite