Memorandum of Law, June 1, 2000: Did the ABM Treaty of 1972 Remain in Force after the USSR Ceased to Exist in December 1991 and Did It Become a Treaty Between the United States and the Russian Federation?

Author： Miron George   Feith Douglas J.  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1521-0448

Source： Comparative Strategy, Vol.20, Iss.2, 2001-05, pp. : 193-196

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The ABM Treaty Requires Senate Consent to Remain Legally in Force

By Turner Robert F.  

Comparative Strategy, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 2001-05 ,pp. : 215-220

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Law, Politics, and the ABM Treaty

By Graham Thomas  

Comparative Strategy, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 2001-05 ,pp. : 197-201

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The United States Senate and the Politics of Ratifying the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

By Roehl Jayson  

Comparative Strategy, Vol. 28, Iss. 4, 2009-09 ,pp. : 303-316

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Legal Status of the ABM Treaty: Alive, but Under the Usual Political Attacks

By Rhinelander John B.  

Comparative Strategy, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 2001-05 ,pp. : 203-213

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Did anti-Jewish mass violence exist in the Soviet Union?—Anti-Semitism and collective violence in the USSR during the war and post war years

By Gruner Frank  

Journal of Genocide Research, Vol. 11, Iss. 2-3, 2009-06 ,pp. : 355-379

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite