

Author: Schroeder Richard
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1521-0723
Source: Society and Natural Resources, Vol.21, Iss.7, 2008-08, pp. : 583-596
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In northern Tanzania in the late 1980s and 1990s, rural communities displaced by the creation of wildlife protection areas advanced a number of grievances centered on equitable access to resources and compensation for wildlife-induced property loss and injuries, only to find their concerns largely ignored by policymakers. Instead, the country's elite cadre of wildlife managers has formed a consensus around the idea that community concerns can best be addressed “through the market” by redistributing wildlife-sector revenues. This article explores three different initiatives whose proponents enjoy different levels of tenure security vis-a-vis wildlife resources. A comparison of these programs demonstrates that they stress quite different and sometimes competing and contradictory rationales for pursuing revenue-sharing strategies, with varying degrees of emphasis on the environmental justice claims of Tanzania's rural citizens.
Related content




Environmental justice and the politics of energy on the US-Mexico border
Environmental Politics, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2007-06 ,pp. :




Calling for Justice in the Goldfields of Tanzania
By Makene Madoshi H. Emel Jody Murphy James T.
Resources, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 2012-12 ,pp. :