Experimental rigs are available for the EHEDG test methods

By  

Trends in Food Science and Technology, Vol. 6, Iss. 4, 1995-04 ,pp. : 132-134

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Experimental Comparison of Excision and Swabbing Microbiological Sampling Methods for Carcasses

By Pepperell Richard   Reid Carol-Ann   Solano Silvia Nicolau   Hutchison Michael L.   Walters Lisa D.   Johnston Alexander M.   Buncic Sava  

Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 68, Iss. 10, 2005-10 ,pp. : 2163-2168

International Association for Food Protection

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Methods for Assessing Reverse Osmosis Membrane Treatment of Shrimp Process Water

By Casani Sandra   Hansen Tina B.   Christensen Jakob   Knøchel Susanne  

Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 68, Iss. 4, 2005-04 ,pp. : 801-807

International Association for Food Protection

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Critical Comparison of Four Test Methods for Determining Overall and Specific Migration from Microwave Susceptor Packaging

By Mountfort Katrina   Kelly Janet   Jickells Sue M.   Castle Laurence  

Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 59, Iss. 5, 1996-05 ,pp. : 534-540

International Association for Food Protection

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Screening methods for the detection of antibiotic residues in slaughter animals: comparison of the European Union Four-Plate Test, the Nouws Antibiotic Test and the Premi®Test (applied to muscle and kidney)

By Pikkemaat M. G.  

Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 26-34

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite