Categorical Default Uncertainty Factors-Interspecies Variation and Adequacy of Database

ISSN： 1080-7039

Source： Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol.7, Iss.1, 2001-01, pp. : 157-163

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

The potential application of categorical (i.e., species, pathway, or group specific) defaults for several components of uncertainty relevant to development of tolerable or reference concentrations/doses is considered-namely, interspecies variation and adequacy of database. For the former, the adequacy of allometric scaling by body surface area as a species-specific default for oral tolerable or reference doses is considered. For the latter, the extent to which data from analyses of subchronic:chronic effect levels, LOAELs/NOAELs, and critical effect levels for complete versus incomplete datasets informs selection of defaults is examined. The relative role of categorical defaults for these aspects is considered in the context of the continuum of increasingly data-informed approaches to characterization of uncertainty and variability that range from default ("presumed protective") to "biologically based predictive".