Destructive standard squares or low-impact visually driven collection? A comparison of methods for quantitative samplings of benthic hydrozoans

Author： Piraino S.   De Vito D.   Brodbeck E.   Di Camillo C. G.   Fanelli G.   Boero F.  

Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd

ISSN： 1125-0003

Source： Italian Journal of Zoology, Vol.80, Iss.3, 2013-09, pp. : 424-436

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Sexual dimorphism in the cane toad Bufo marinus: a quantitative comparison of visual inspection methods for sexing individuals

By Narayan E.   Christi K.   Morley C.   Trevenen P.  

The Herpetological Journal, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2008-01 ,pp. : 63-65

British Herpetological Society

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A quantitative comparison of two sample methods for collecting Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Missouri

By Petry William   Foré Stephanie   Fielden Laura   Kim Hyun-Joo  

Experimental and Applied Acarology, Vol. 52, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. : 427-438

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of different imputation methods from low- to high-density panels using Chinese Holstein cattle

By  

animal, Vol. 7, Iss. 5, 2012-12 ,pp. : 729-735

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Assessing parental effort in a Neotropical parrot: a comparison of methods

By Siegel R.B.   Weathers W.W.   Beissinger S.R.  

Animal Behaviour, Vol. 57, Iss. 1, 1999-01 ,pp. : 73-79

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Use of partial least squares regression to predict single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes when some animals are genotyped with a low-density panel

By  

animal, Vol. 5, Iss. 6, 2011-01 ,pp. : 833-837

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite