Effectiveness in social impact assessment: Aboriginal peoples and resource development in Australia

ISSN： 1471-5465

Source： Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol.27, Iss.2, 2009-06, pp. : 95-110

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Definitions of and judgments regarding effectiveness in social impact assessment (SIA) depend on how the purposes of SIA are understood. They are defined differently by various interests that participate in, or are affected by, impact assessment processes, and the concept of 'effectiveness' and the issue of what is required to achieve it are both contested and contextual. This article reviews a number of different approaches to SIA and outlines what effectiveness might mean for each. It then considers, at two levels, what 'effective SIA' involves in the context of large-scale resource development on Aboriginal land in Australia. The first level involves control of SIA. For indigenous peoples who have historically been excluded from and ignored by SIAs undertaken as part of government approval processes, Aboriginal control is an essential prerequisite for 'effective SIA'. However, control only creates the potential for effectiveness. The second level of analysis involves the practical activities that must be undertaken, and issues that must be addressed, to realize this potential. The author develops a matrix designed to help identify and manage these activities and issues in a systematic way.