Author: Priha Eero Pennanen Sirpa Rantio Tiina Uitti Jukka Liesivuori Jyrki
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN: 1545-9624
Source: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol.1, Iss.11, 2004-11, pp. : 738-744
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The goals of this study were (1) to investigate workers' exposure to medium-density fiber (MDF) dust (inhalable dust, particle size), formaldehyde, and volatile organic compounds; (2) to study the possible inflammatory nasal reactions caused by exposure to MDF board dust; and (3) to determine the occurrence of irritative symptoms among exposed workers. Nasal lavage fluid was analyzed for cytokines and nitric oxide/nitrite, and inflammatory cells were counted. The time-weighted average of MDF dust was 1.4 mg/m3in the workers' breathing zones. MDF board dust was composed mainly of particles exceeding 10μm in diameter. The MDF board dust released formaldehyde in concentration of about 1000μg/g when extracted with water for 6 hours at 37°C. The cell counts and cytokine levels of the nasal lavage fluid samples did not show statistically significant differences between the workers exposed to MDF board dust and those exposed to other wood dusts. Nevertheless, two MDF-exposed workers had a considerable increase in the proportion of eosinophils and cytokine levels. Several workers exposed to MDF and wood dusts experienced nasal, eye, and skin symptoms at the end of a work shift. Both exposed groups had significantly more nasal symptoms, although the median dust level was only 1.2 mg/m3, considerably less than the occupational exposure limit for wood dust in Finland. Nasal symptoms were more frequent among workers exposed to MDF board dust and did not correlate with smoking. Our results suggest that the occupational exposure limit of 5 mg/m3is probably too high for MDF board dust.
Related content
By Hursthouse Andrew Allan Fraser Rowley Louise Smith Frank
International Journal of Environmental Health Research, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, 2004-08 ,pp. :