

Author: Ippolito James A. Barbarick Kenneth A.
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
ISSN: 1938-6478
Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol.2001, Iss.1, 2001-01, pp. : 348-358
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
As landfill space becomes less available, many municipalities will have to look towards alternative methods of waste disposal. Wastewater biosolids have been extensively studied and proven as a recyclable material. Water treatment plant residuals (WTR), on the other hand, have been but briefly studied. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has established guidelines regarding land co-application of WTR and biosolids since the WTR is postulated to greatly reduce plant P availability and possibly provide an additional source of trace metals to soil. If co-application ratios can be established so as to not tie up P and limit its plant uptake, co-application will be an environmentally safe method of recycling. In a laboratory study, we investigated the biosolids-borne P adsorption capacity of an alum-containing WTR from two Colorado municipalities. Our adsorption study indicated that co-mixing of both municipalities' WTR and biosolids at ratios of 8:1 will adsorb most soluble biosolids P. Beyond this ratio the WTR could adsorb all biosolids available P and possibly some soil-borne P. In a greenhouse study we co-applied various ratios of WTR and biosolids to soil growing either blue grama (
Related content






Water treatment plant residuals management
By Dharmappa H.B. Hasia A. Hagare P.
Water Science and Technology, Vol. 35, Iss. 8, 1997-01 ,pp. :

