Response to comments by Gurney et al. regarding “Carbon dioxide emission tallies for 210 U.S. coal-fired power plants: A comparison of two accounting methods”

Author：  

Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd

ISSN： 1096-2247

Source： Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol.64, Iss.11, 2014-11, pp. : 1218-1220

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Comment on Quick, J.C. 2014. Carbon dioxide emission tallies for 210 U.S. coal-fired power plants: A comparison of two accounting methods. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64: 73–79

By      

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 64, Iss. 11, 2014-11 ,pp. : 1215-1217

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

UNEP Demonstrations of Mercury Emission Reduction at Two Coal-fired Power Plants in Russia

By Jozewicz W.  

E3S Web of conferences, Vol. 1, Iss. issue, 2013-04 ,pp. : 36005-36005

Edp Sciences

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Outdoor Noise of Coal-Fired Power Plants

By Dennison E. Earl   Kanistanaux David C.   Ying Shuh-Pan  

Noise Control Engineering, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, 1980-01 ,pp. : 30-37

Institute of Noise Control Engineering

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Study on SO3 Cooperative Removal Effect of Ultra-low Emission Technology in Coal-fired Power Plants

By  

E3S Web of conferences, Vol. 53, Iss. issue, 2018-09 ,pp. : 04005-04005

Edp Sciences

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Potential of CO2 Capture and Storage Technology in South Africa’s Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plants

By Yoro Kelvin O.   Sekoai Patrick T.  

Environments, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, 2016-09 ,pp. : 24-24

MDPI

Access to resources Recommend Favorite