Comparing statistical methods for the correction of the systematic effects and for the related uncertainty assessment

ISSN： 1742-6596

Source： Journal of Physics: Conference Series , Vol.238, Iss.1, 2010-07, pp. : 267-270

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The statistical uncertainty of the Heydemann correction: a practical limit of optical quadrature homodyne interferometry

By Köning Rainer Wimmer Gejza Witkovský Viktor

Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 26, Iss. 8, 2015-08 ,pp. : 84004-84015

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods

By Sciacchitano Andrea Neal Douglas R Smith Barton L Warner Scott O Vlachos Pavlos P Wieneke Bernhard Scarano Fulvio

Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 26, Iss. 7, 2015-07 ,pp. : 74004-74019

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Note about the Statistical Background of the Methods Used in ISO/DIS 9612 to Estimate the Uncertainty of Occupational Noise Exposure Measurements

By Thiery Léon Ognedal Tonnes

Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 94, Iss. 2, 2008-03 ,pp. : 331-334

S. Hirzel Verlag

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods

By Richter Rudolf Kellenberger Tobias Kaufmann Hermann

Remote Sensing, Vol. 1, Iss. 3, 2009-07 ,pp. : 184-196

MDPI

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Effects of 2D misalignment on tensile results and corresponding correction methods to obtain the true stress–strain curve

By Zhao Hongwei Cheng Hongbing Li Jianping

Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 25, Iss. 11, 2014-11 ,pp. : 115011-115020

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite