Fragrance mix I: TRUE Test® versus pet.‐based patch test

E-ISSN： 1600-0536|72|4|256-258

ISSN： 0105-1873

Source： CONTACT DERMATITIS, Vol.72, Iss.4, 2015-04, pp. : 256-258

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series – analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009–2012

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Vol. 73, Iss. 3, 2015-09 ,pp. : 163-171

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparing patch test results of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone tested with both TRUE Test® and 100 ppm using investigator‐loaded chambers

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Vol. 78, Iss. 2, 2018-02 ,pp. : 159-161

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AL‐TEST PATCH TEST*

THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 1975-09 ,pp. : 111-114

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Diagnostic Testing for Nickel Allergic Hypersensitivity: Patch Testing versus Lymphocyte Transformation Test

Exogenous Dermatology, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, 2002-06 ,pp. : 53-63

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Diagnostic accuracy of patch test in children with food allergy

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, Vol. 26, Iss. 5, 2015-08 ,pp. : 416-422

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite