Comparison of the C‐MAC® and GlideScope® videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine disorders and immobilisation

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1365-2044|70|2|160-165

ISSN： 0003-2409

Source： ANAESTHESIA, Vol.70, Iss.2, 2015-02, pp. : 160-165

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 64, Iss. 10, 2009-10 ,pp. : 1125-1129

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A randomized multi‐institutional crossover comparison of the GlideScope® Cobalt Video laryngoscope to the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope in a Pierre Robin manikin

By  

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol. 25, Iss. 8, 2015-08 ,pp. : 801-806

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

C‐MAC versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the ED

By  

EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, Vol. 27, Iss. 2, 2015-04 ,pp. : 119-125

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Fiberoptic intubation with intraoral digital manipulation may be superior to C‐Mac videolaryngoscope in minimizing hypertensive response in cervical paraganlioma of the parapharyngeal area

By  

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol. 25, Iss. 8, 2015-08 ,pp. : 863-864

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Disposable C‐MAC® – not the same but same enough

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 70, Iss. 3, 2015-03 ,pp. : 371-372

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite