Rejoinder to ‘Alternatives to resolution III regular fractional factorial designs for 9 – 14 factors in 16 runs’

E-ISSN： 1526-4025|31|1|62-63

ISSN： 1524-1904

Source： APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, Vol.31, Iss.1, 2015-01, pp. : 62-63

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Discussion of ‘Alternatives to resolution III regular fractional factorial designs for 9–14 factors in 16 runs’

APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, Vol. 31, Iss. 1, 2015-01 ,pp. : 59-61

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Alternatives to resolution III regular fractional factorial designs for 9–14 factors in 16 runs

APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, Vol. 31, Iss. 1, 2015-01 ,pp. : 50-58

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rejoinder to ‘Efficient Prediction Designs for Random Fields’

APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, 2015-03 ,pp. : 201-203

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On the properties of the Dickey-Pantula test against fractional alternatives

By Dolado J.J. Marmol F.

Economics Letters, Vol. 57, Iss. 1, 1997-11 ,pp. : 11-16

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rejoinder

By Ravagnani Fabio

Review of Political Economy, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 151-155

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite