Another Challenge for the Presumed Safety Advantage of Bare Metal Stents

E-ISSN： 1522-726x|85|4|542-543

ISSN： 1522-1946

Source： CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Vol.85, Iss.4, 2015-03, pp. : 542-543

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Long‐term safety and efficacy of second‐generation everolimus‐eluting stents compared to other limus‐eluting stents and bare metal stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Vol. 84, Iss. 7, 2014-12 ,pp. : 1053-1060

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Drug‐eluting stents versus bare metal stents prior to noncardiac surgery

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Vol. 85, Iss. 4, 2015-03 ,pp. : 533-541

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Diminished Benefits of Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency

Nephron Clin Pract, Vol. 113, Iss. 3, 2009-08 ,pp. : c198-c202

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Drug-Eluting Stents Compared with Bare Metal Stents Improve Late Outcome after Saphenous Vein Graft but Not after Large Native Vessel Interventions

Cardiology, Vol. 112, Iss. 1, 2008-06 ,pp. : 49-55

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Bare-Metal and Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Aorto-Ostial Coronary Disease

Cardiology, Vol. 111, Iss. 4, 2008-05 ,pp. : 270-276

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite