The Need for a Methodological Framework for Comparative Legal Research – Sense and Nonsense of “Methodological Pluralism” in Comparative Law

Publisher： Mohr Siebeck

E-ISSN： 1868-7059|79|3|589-623

ISSN： 0033-7250

Source： Rabels Zeitschrift fuer auslaendisches und internationales Privatrecht, Vol.79, Iss.3, 2015-01, pp. : 589-623

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law

By  

European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, 2009-10 ,pp. : 481-500

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Objective pluralism: the comparative law tool

By Canuel Edward Thomas  

International Journal of Private Law, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2013-04 ,pp. : 150-192

Inderscience Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparative Law and Legal Change

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 37, Iss. 2, 1978-11 ,pp. : 313-336

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Legal Nationalism: Lord Cooper, Legal History and Comparative Law

By MacQueen Hector L  

Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, 2005-9 ,pp. : 395-406

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Traditional Chinese Medicine and European Union Law: Cultural Logics, Product Identities, Market Competition, Legal Rechanneling, and the Need for Global Legal and Medical Pluralism

By Snyder Francis   Yi Lu   Yazdani Gulrez  

Peking University Law Journal, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, 2014-06 ,pp. : 129-200

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite