

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1744-6198|50|2|63-68
ISSN: 0029-6473
Source: NURSING FORUM, Vol.50, Iss.2, 2015-04, pp. : 63-68
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
PurposeA staff‐driven peer review process was developed and implemented to determine if it would improve the perception of the quality of nursing care delivered and unit performance.ConclusionsPerceived quality of care, as measured on the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators Survey, improved by the second year after all nurses had completed the process. The unit performance improvement indicators showed improvement in the first year after implementation, with further improvements noted the second year.Practice ImplicationThis project demonstrated that staff nurses could and would autonomously improve practice and unit performance based on unit data.Brann
Related content


THE JOURNAL'S PEER‐REVIEW PROCESS: A TWO‐WAY STREET
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Vol. 40, Iss. 10, 1992-10 ,pp. :


Update: Clarification Process and Periodic Performance Review Process
JCAH Perspectives, Vol. 27, Iss. 11, 2007-11 ,pp. :




British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 57, Iss. 536, 2007-03 ,pp. :