How to critically read ecological meta‐analyses

E-ISSN： 1759-2887|6|2|124-133

ISSN： 1759-2879

Source： RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, Vol.6, Iss.2, 2015-06, pp. : 124-133

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Publication bias in meta‐analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, Vol. 34, Iss. 20, 2015-09 ,pp. : 2781-2793

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12 894 meta‐analyses

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2015-06 ,pp. : 195-205

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Statistical methods for meta‐analyses including information from studies without any events—add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, Vol. 34, Iss. 7, 2015-03 ,pp. : 1097-1116

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Adaptive and repeated cumulative meta‐analyses of safety data during a new drug development process

PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS: THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2015-05 ,pp. : 161-171

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta‐analyses

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2015-06 ,pp. : 175-187

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite