

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1365-2559|309-0167|4|562-567
ISSN: 0309-0167
Source: HISTOPATHOLOGY, Vol.309-0167, Iss.4, 2015-10, pp. : 562-567
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
AimsBile duct adenomas (BDA) and bile duct hamartomas (BDH) are benign bile duct lesions considered neoplastic or secondary to ductal plate malformation, respectively. We have reported previously a high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations detected by allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assay in BDA, and suggested that BDA may be precursors to a subset of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas harbouring V600E mutations. The aim of the present study was to assess the existence of BRAF V600E mutations, using immunohistochemical methods, in additional BDA as well as in BDH.Methods and resultsFifteen BDA and 35 BDH were retrieved from the archives of the pathology departments of two French university hospitals. All cases were reviewed by two pathologists specialized in liver diseases. BRAF V600E mutational status was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Mutated BRAF mutant protein was detected in 53% of the BDA and in none of the cases of BDH.ConclusionOur findings suggest that BDA and BDH are different processes, and that BDA represent true benign neoplasms. They also support the hypothesis that mutated BDA might precede the development of the subset of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas harbouring BRAF V600E mutations.
Related content


BRAF V600E mutational status in bile duct adenomas and hamartomas
HISTOPATHOLOGY, Vol. 67, Iss. 4, 2015-10 ,pp. :


BRAF Mutation (V600E) Prevalence in Mexican Patients Diagnosed with Melanoma
Case Reports in Oncology, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2016-04 ,pp. :




Immunohistochemical staining for BRAF V600E supports the diagnosis of metanephric adenoma
HISTOPATHOLOGY, Vol. 66, Iss. 6, 2015-05 ,pp. :