EP01.13: A comparison between two 3D ultrasound contrast‐enhancing techniques for subpubic arch angle measurement

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1469-0705|46|S1|188-189

ISSN： 0960-7692

Source： ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol.46, Iss.S1, 2015-09, pp. : 188-189

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

P04.08: A comparison between two 3D ultrasound contrast‐enhancing techniques for pelvic floor assessment

By  

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol. 46, Iss. S1, 2015-09 ,pp. : 134-134

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery

By  

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol. 46, Iss. 4, 2015-10 ,pp. : 496-500

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery

By  

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol. 960-7692, Iss. 4, 2015-10 ,pp. : 496-500

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

OC18.01: Correlation between subpubic arch angle (SPA) and mode of delivery in large‐for‐gestational age fetuses

By  

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol. 48, Iss. S1, 2016-09 ,pp. : 33-34

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Re: Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery. T. Ghi, A. Youssef, F. Martelli, F. Bellussi, E. Aiello, G. Pilu, N. Rizzo, T. Frusca, D. Arduini and G. Rizzo. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 511–515.

By  

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol. 48, Iss. 4, 2016-10 ,pp. : 425-425

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite