

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1460-2695|38|5|528-539
ISSN: 8756-758x
Source: FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, Vol.38, Iss.5, 2015-05, pp. : 528-539
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
AbstractFatigue crack growth tests were conducted on compact, C(T), specimens made of 7249‐T76511 aluminium alloy. These tests were conducted to generate crack growth rate data from threshold to near fracture over a wide range of load ratios (R). Four methods were used to generate near threshold data: (1) ASTM E‐647 load reduction (LR), (2) compression pre‐cracking constant‐amplitude (CPCA), (3) compression pre‐cracking LR, and (4) constant crack mouth opening displacement LR method. A crack closure analysis was used to develop an effective stress‐intensity factor range against rate relation using a constraint factor (α = 1.85).Simulated aircraft wing spectrum tests were conducted on middle crack tension, M(T), specimens using a modified full‐scale fatigue test spectrum. The tests were used to develop the constraint‐loss regime (plane strain to plane stress; α = 1.85 to 1.15) behaviour. Comparisons were made between the spectrum tests and calculations made with the FASTRAN life prediction code; and the calculated crack growth lives were generally with ±10% of the test results.
Related content








Statistical moments of fatigue crack growth under random loading
By Zou X.L.
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 2003-01 ,pp. :


By Pantelakis S.G. Kermanidis A.T. Daglaras P.G.
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, 1997-10 ,pp. :