

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1521-3765|20|46|15226-15232
ISSN: 0947-6539
Source: CHEMISTRY - A EUROPEAN JOURNAL, Vol.20, Iss.46, 2014-11, pp. : 15226-15232
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
AbstractThe use of flow photochemistry and its apparent superiority over batch has been reported by a number of groups in recent years. To rigorously determine whether flow does indeed have an advantage over batch, a broad range of synthetic photochemical transformations were optimized in both reactor modes and their yields and productivities compared. Surprisingly, yields were essentially identical in all comparative cases. Even more revealing was the observation that the productivity of flow reactors varied very little to that of their batch counterparts when the key reaction parameters were matched. Those with a single layer of fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) had an average productivity 20 % lower than that of batch, whereas three‐layer reactors were 20 % more productive. Finally, the utility of flow chemistry was demonstrated in the scale‐up of the ring‐opening reaction of a potentially explosive [1.1.1] propellane with butane‐2,3‐dione.
Related content




By Zajac J. Dutartre R. Jones D.J. Roziere J.
Thermochimica Acta, Vol. 379, Iss. 1, 2001-11 ,pp. :


Heat transfer performance for batch oscillatory flow mixing
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 25, Iss. 8, 2002-02 ,pp. :


Modelling the Flow of Yield-Stress Fluids in Porous Media
By Sochi Taha
Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 85, Iss. 2, 2010-11 ,pp. :


Packaging of yield stress fluids: Flow patterns
AICHE JOURNAL, Vol. 64, Iss. 3, 2018-03 ,pp. :