

Author: De Santis L Cino I Rabellotti E Papaleo E Calzi F Fusi FM Brigante C Ferrari A
Publisher: Reproductive Healthcare Ltd
ISSN: 1472-6483
Source: Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol.14, Iss.1, 2007-01, pp. : 57-63
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Oocyte cryopreservation represents an important option for management of female fertility, avoiding the ethical concerns associated with embryo storage. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcome of two alternative slow freezing protocols involving different sucrose concentrations. From January 2004 to March 2006, spare oocytes from selected couples undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were frozen using a slow-cooling protocol and thawed at a later stage. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 65), whose oocytes were frozen with propane-1,2-diol (PrOH) and 0.1 mol/l sucrose; and group B (n = 66) whose oocytes were frozen with 0.3 mol/l sucrose. A total of 543 oocytes were thawed in group A and 601 in group B, achieving a survival rate of 24.3 and 71.2% respectively. Whilst fertilization rate (53.5 and 80.4% respectively) was higher in group B, enhanced results for group A were achieved over all (implantation rate per transferred embryos 12.2 versus 5.7%; pregnancy rate per transfer 16.7 versus 9.5%). Normal births and ongoing pregnancies have occurred in both groups. Although in slow-cooling methods higher sucrose concentration in the freezing mixture allows higher post-thaw survival and fertilization rates, overall this did not coincide with an improved clinical outcome.
Related content


Evidence-based clinical outcome of oocyte slow cooling
By Borini A Bianchi V Bonu MA Sciajno R Sereni E Cattoli M Mazzone S Trevisi MR Iadarola I Distratis V Nalon M Coticchio G
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2007-08 ,pp. :


Slow Cooling Cryopreservation of Cell-Microcarrier Constructs
Cells Tissues Organs, Vol. 192, Iss. 3, 2010-04 ,pp. :



