Recognizing the problem of delayed entry in time‐to‐event studies: Better late than never for clinical neuroscientists

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1531-8249|78|6|839-844

ISSN： 0364-5134

Source： ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Vol.78, Iss.6, 2015-12, pp. : 839-844

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A logrank test-based method for sizing clinical trials with two co-primary time-to-event endpoints

By Sugimoto Tomoyuki   Sozu Takashi   Hamasaki Toshimitsu   Evans Scott R.  

Biostatistics, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2013-07 ,pp. : 409-421

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Bayesian model for time-to-event data with informative censoring

By Kaciroti Niko A.   Raghunathan Trivellore E.   Taylor Jeremy M. G.   Julius Stevo  

Biostatistics, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2012-04 ,pp. : 341-354

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Attributable risk function in the proportional hazards model for censored time-to-event

By Chen Ying Qing   Hu Chengcheng   Wang Yan  

Biostatistics, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2006-10 ,pp. : 515-529

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Modeling time‐to‐event (survival) data using classification tree analysis

By  

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 23, Iss. 6, 2017-12 ,pp. : 1299-1308

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clinical Outcome: A Monosomy 18p is Better than a Tetrasomy 18p

By  

Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Vol. 144, Iss. 4, 2015-01 ,pp. : 294-298

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite