Related content

Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test

By CockmartinLesley   MarshallNicholas W   Chantal Van Ongeval   AertsGwen   StalmansDavina   ZancaFederica   ShaheenEman   Frederik De Keyzer   DanceDavid R   YoungKenneth C   BosmansHilde  

Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 60, Iss. 10, 2015-05 ,pp. : 3939-3958

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data

By Bouwman R W   van Engen R E   Young K C   Heeten G J den   Broeders M J M   Schopphoven S   Jeukens C R L P N   Veldkamp W J H   Dance D R  

Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 60, Iss. 20, 2015-10 ,pp. : 7893-7907

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Suspicious Findings at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Occult to Conventional Digital Mammography: Imaging Features and Pathology Findings

By  

THE BREAST JOURNAL, Vol. 21, Iss. 5, 2015-09 ,pp. : 538-542

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images

By  

Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 59, Iss. 23, 2014-12 ,pp. : 7457-7477

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images

By Goodsitt Mitchell M   Chan Heang-Ping   Schmitz Andrea   Zelakiewicz Scott   Telang Santosh   Hadjiiski Lubomir   Watcharotone Kuanwong   Helvie Mark A   Paramagul Chintana   Neal Colleen   Christodoulou Emmanuel   Larson Sandra C   Carson Paul L  

Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 59, Iss. 19, 2014-10 ,pp. : 5883-5902

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite