Queer arithmetics 1 For helpful criticisms of earlier drafts of this paper I am indebted to Mr. Eugene Steiner, Mr. Tom Sizemore and my wife.

Author： Lehman Hugh  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 0004-8402

Source： Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.48, Iss.1, 1970-05, pp. : 31-43

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Ought, obligation and duty 1 I am indebted to Prof. P. Herbst for helpful discussions on this subject, and to Dr. J. Burnheim, Mr. S. I. Benn, Prof. R. L. Franklin and Mr. G. Molnar for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.

By Beran Harry  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, Iss. 3, 1972-12 ,pp. : 207-221

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Definition by internal relation 1 I am grateful to Professor Sidney Morgenbesser for his helpful criticisms of earlier drafts of the following paper; he is of course not responsible for any errors which may remain.

By Jarvis Judith  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 39, Iss. 2, 1961-08 ,pp. : 125-142

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams.

By Montague Roger  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 1965-01 ,pp. : 144-167

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On justifying a metaethical theory 1 I am indebted to Mr. Fred Berger of the University of California and Dr. Douglas McGee of Vassar College for their critical comments on an earlier draft of this paper

By Blackstone William  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1963-01 ,pp. : 57-66

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An analysis of Hare's application of the thesis of universalizability in his moral arguments*I am indebted to Professors D. Gauthier and L. W. Sumner for their helpful criticisms of this paper. The latter especially is to be thanked for his copious comments on several early drafts. His suggestions regarding the presentation of the material are in large part responsible for the present form of this paper.

By White Harold  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 47, Iss. 2, 1969-08 ,pp. : 174-183

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite