Related content

C. B. Martin

By Heil John  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 87, Iss. 1, 2009-03 ,pp. : 177-179

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Pragmatics of Empirical AdequacyThanks are due to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and to the University of Melbourne for support of this research. This paper has benefited from discussion with members of the Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science departments at the University of Melbourne and the Philosophy department at La Trobe University, as well as from the comments and suggestions of three anonymous referees.

By Brown Bryson  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, Iss. 2, 2004-06 ,pp. : 242-264

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

From A.B. Kempe to Josiah Royce via C.S. Peirce: Addenda to a recent paper by Pratt

By Grattan-Guinness I.  

History and Philosophy of Logic, Vol. 28, Iss. 3, 2007-08 ,pp. : 265-266

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Defeasibility and scepticism 1 An earlier version of this paper was read at the annual meeting of the American Philosophical Association in Chicago 1973. The present draft has benefitted extensively from the observations made by the commentator Richard Hull. I am also thankful for the observations made by C. J. Bryant, M. Swain, M. Woodhouse and R. Arrington.

By Almeder Robert  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 51, Iss. 3, 1973-12 ,pp. : 238-244

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams.

By Montague Roger  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 1965-01 ,pp. : 144-167

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite