On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'

ISSN： 0004-8402

Source： Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.81, Iss.3, 2003-09, pp. : 369-382

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Rethinking Bivalence

By Iacona A.

Synthese, Vol. 146, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. : 283-302

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Entailment and Bivalence

By Michael F.S.

Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 31, Iss. 4, 2002-08 ,pp. : 289-300

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Against Williamson's Arguments About Bivalence

PHILOSOPHICAL FORUM, Vol. 47, Iss. 3-4, 2016-09 ,pp. : 325-340

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Knowability and bivalence: intuitionistic solutions to the Paradox of Knowability

By Murzi Julien

Philosophical Studies, Vol. 149, Iss. 2, 2010-06 ,pp. : 269-281

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why is Socrates’ ‘Absurd Question’ Absurd? (Plato, Symposium 199 C 6-D 7)

By O’Brien Denis

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2010-04 ,pp. : 4-26

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite