SoC It To Me? Reply to McDaniel On MaxCon Simples

ISSN： 0004-8402

Source： Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.82, Iss.2, 2004-06, pp. : 332-340

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Against Maxcon Simples

By McDaniel Kris

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 81, Iss. 2, 2003-06 ,pp. : 265-275

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

More Problems for MaxCon: Contingent Particularity and Stuff-Thing Coincidence

By Steen Mark

Acta Analytica, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 2011-06 ,pp. : 135-154

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On poor and not so poor thought experiments. A reply to Daniel Cohnitz

By Peijnenburg Jeanne Atkinson David

Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 38, Iss. 1, 2007-04 ,pp. : 159-161

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Simples

By Markosian Ned

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 76, Iss. 2, 1998-06 ,pp. : 213-228

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Peter—Apocalyptic Seer: The Influence of the Apocalypse Genre on Matthew's Portrayal of Peter. By John R.Markley. WUNT, II/348. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013. Pp. xv + 285. €79.00.

RELIGIOUS STUDIES REVIEW, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 2015-03 ,pp. : 24-24

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite