Related content

Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Index (POP-Q-I): a novel interpretation of the POP-Q system for optimization of POP research

By Lemos Nucélio   Auge Antonio   Lunardelli Jacqueline   Carramão Silvia   Faria Ana   Aoki Tsutomu  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, 2008-07 ,pp. : 995-997

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

POP-Q 2.0: its time has come!

By Harmanli Oz  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 25, Iss. 4, 2014-04 ,pp. : 447-449

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The POP-Q system: two decades of progress and debate

By Bump Richard  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 25, Iss. 4, 2014-04 ,pp. : 441-443

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“Eyeball” POP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool?

By Karp Deborah   Peterson Thais   Jean-Michel Marjorie   Lefevre Roger   Davila G.   Aguilar Vivian  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 21, Iss. 8, 2010-08 ,pp. : 1005-1009

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Point Aa of the POP-Q system as a predictive value of urethral mobility in women

By Kim Sun-Ouck   Chung Ho   Hwang Eu   Oh Kyung   Kwon Dongdeuk  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 687-691

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite