Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1539-6975|82|3|571-599
ISSN: 0022-4367
Source: JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, Vol.82, Iss.3, 2015-09, pp. : 571-599
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
AbstractPrior literature documents that larger boards pursue conservative investment policies and that their decision outcomes are moderate, which promote an environment of risk aversion. I argue that this risk aversion hurts equity holders when firms hold a larger amount of long‐term debt. Addressing potential endogeneity problems associated with board size, I find an equity discount associated with larger boards in firms that have greater amounts of long‐term debt. On the other hand, larger boards are associated with an equity premium when firms have a greater short‐term debt‐to‐assets ratio. The equity discount associated with larger boards disappears in firms with no long‐term debt. Further analysis also indicates that firms with larger boards enjoy a better credit rating and a lower realized cost of debt. Overall, analysis in this study suggests that the association between board size and equity value is a function of a firm's debt structure.
Related content
An empirical test of the effect of board size on firm efficiency
Economics Letters, Vol. 54, Iss. 3, 1997-07 ,pp. :
Does layoff risk explain the firm-size wage differential?
Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 2, Iss. 7, 1995-07 ,pp. :
INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY AND THE DISCOUNT RATE FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, 2011-06 ,pp. :
On the Evolution of Firm Size Distributions
By Angelini Paolo Generale Andrea
The American Economic Review, Vol. 98, Iss. 1, 2008-03 ,pp. :