Reproducibility of MR‐based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same‐day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1522-2586|42|3|811-817

ISSN： 1053-1807

Source： JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol.42, Iss.3, 2015-09, pp. : 811-817

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Aortic 4D flow: Quantification of signal‐to‐noise ratio as a function of field strength and contrast enhancement for 1.5T, 3T, and 7T

By  

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, Vol. 73, Iss. 5, 2015-05 ,pp. : 1864-1871

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of optical and MR‐based tracking

By  

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, Vol. 74, Iss. 3, 2015-09 ,pp. : 894-902

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Test‐retest reproducibility of neurochemical profiles with short‐echo, single‐voxel MR spectroscopy at 3T and 7T

By  

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, Vol. 76, Iss. 4, 2016-10 ,pp. : 1083-1091

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reproducibility measurements of three methods for calculating in vivo MR‐based knee kinematics

By  

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol. 42, Iss. 2, 2015-08 ,pp. : 533-538

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reproducibility and reliability of short‐TE whole‐brain MR spectroscopic imaging of human brain at 3T

By  

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, Vol. 73, Iss. 3, 2015-03 ,pp. : 921-928

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite