Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN： 1469-8986|52|7|969-972
ISSN： 0048-5772
Source： PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY (ELECTRONIC), Vol.52, Iss.7, 2015-07, pp. : 969-972
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
AbstractThere has been discussion lately about whether bootstrap versus permutations methods are the more appropriate in diagnostic psychophysiology, especially in the context of concealed information tests (CITs), also called guilty knowledge tests (GKTs). We review the use of bootstrapping in most published CIT/GKT studies (where means, or correlations, as opposed to peak amplitudes are estimated) and find them valid and reliable. When bootstrapping and permutations were applied to the same synthesized ERP datasets, they agreed 98.1% of the time, averaged over 24,000 iterations.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
An Ambiguity Test for Definite Descriptions
By Sennet A.
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 111, Iss. 1, 2002-10 ,pp. :
Semantic Bootstrapping of Type-Logical Grammar
By Fulop Sean
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, 2005-12 ,pp. :
Nonexistent objects versus definite descriptions
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 62, Iss. 4, 1984-12 ,pp. :