

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1748-121x|35|2|280-301
ISSN: 0261-3875
Source: LEGAL STUDIES, Vol.35, Iss.2, 2015-06, pp. : 280-301
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The doctrine of insurable interest grew out of eighteenth‐century anxieties over fraudulent seafarers and habitual gamblers. It was created by the courts, entrenched by statute and remains in place to this day despite the fact that it serves no practical or legal purpose. It was hoped by many that, when the English Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission established their joint review of insurance contract law in 2006, the doctrine would be consigned to the proverbial dustbin of history. Eight years later, these hopes have been dashed. The doctrine is here to stay. This paper asks ‘Why’ and finds the answer to be elusive.
Related content


The Nuclear Forces and Doctrine of the Russian Federation
Comparative Strategy, Vol. 27, Iss. 5, 2008-10 ,pp. :


Cold Start: The Life Cycle of a Doctrine
By Ahmed Ali
Comparative Strategy, Vol. 31, Iss. 5, 2012-11 ,pp. :


The Human Rights Act and the doctrine of precedent
LEGAL STUDIES, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2015-03 ,pp. :


Deception: Appeal for Acceptance; Discourse on Doctrine; Preface to Planning
By JAJKO WALTER
Comparative Strategy, Vol. 21, Iss. 5, 2002-01 ,pp. :


The Nuclear Doctrine and Forces of the People's Republic of China
Comparative Strategy, Vol. 28, Iss. 3, 2009-07 ,pp. :