Erratum: TruongM, SlezakJA, LinCP, IremashviliV, SadoM, RazmariaAA, LeversonG, SolowayMS, EggenerSE, AbelEJ, DownsTM, and JarrardDF. Development and multi‐institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. Cancer. 2013;119:3992–4002.

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1097-0142|120|5|769-769

ISSN： 0008-543x

Source： CANCER, Vol.120, Iss.5, 2014-03, pp. : 769-769

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Development and multi‐institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer

By  

CANCER, Vol. 119, Iss. 22, 2013-11 ,pp. : 3992-4002

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Gleason Score 6 - Prostate Cancer or Benign Variant?

By  

Oncology Research and Treatment, Vol. 38, Iss. 12, 2015-0 ,pp. : 629-632

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Erratum: Zafarana G, Ishkanian AS, Malloff CA, Locke JA, Sykes J, Thoms J, Lam WL, Squire JA, Yoshimoto M, Ramnarine VR, Meng A, Ahmed O, Jurisca I, Milosevic M, Pintilie M, van der Kwast T and Bristow RG. Copy number alterations of c‐MYC and PTEN are prognostic factors for relapse after prostate cancer radiotherapy. Cancer. 2012;118:4053‐62.

By  

CANCER, Vol. 120, Iss. 15, 2014-08 ,pp. : 2380-2380

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading in the Surgical Specimen: Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who were Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System

By  

Current Urology, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2017-07 ,pp. : 118-125

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading to Higher Patterns in the Surgical Specimen. Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading to Higher Gleason Patterns in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who Have Been Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 97, Iss. 1, 2016-03 ,pp. : 32-41

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite