Author： Enger Hans-Olav Nesset Tore
Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN： 0332-5865
Source： Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Vol.22, Iss.1, 1999-09, pp. : 27-60
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper shows that Cognitive Grammar is valuable for typological studies. The Norwegian and Russian reflexive-middle-passive systems are analysed comprehensively and compared. Whereas Cognitive Grammar is compatible with the typological tradition (represented by Kemmer), it needs amendment in certain important respects. The main theoretical contribution of the paper is that the Cognitive Grammar notions of “instantiation”, “prototype”, “entrenchment” and “extension” are useful; without these notions, interesting generalizations about the Norwegian and Russian systems are inexpressible. The main empirical contribution of the paper is that a full-fledged analysis of the Russian system is presented. In addition, Kemmer's analysis of Norwegian is improved upon, partly because findings from the generative tradition are incorporated.
Related content
Typological evidence and Universal Grammar
Studies in Language, Vol. 28, Iss. 3, 2004-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Middle Verbs, Reflexive Middle Constructions, and Middle Voice
By Klaiman M.H.
Studies in Language, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, 1992-01 ,pp. :