Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals

Author： Ågerstrand Marlene   Edvardsson Linnéa   Rudén Christina  

Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd

ISSN： 1080-7039

Source： Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol.20, Iss.6, 2014-11, pp. : 1427-1445

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Use of immunotoxicity data in health risk assessments: uncertainties and research to improve the process

By Selgrade M.K.  

Toxicology, Vol. 133, Iss. 1, 1999-03 ,pp. : 59-72

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Environmental monitoring, evaluation and protection in New York: linking science and policyA peer-reviewed selection of papers presented 24-25 September 2001, in Albany, NY

By Watson M.R.   Sistla G.  

Environmental Pollution, Vol. 123, Iss. 3, 2003-06 ,pp. : 325-326

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Design and evaluation of TIEE, a peer‐reviewed electronic teaching resource

By  

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, 2006-05 ,pp. : 189-195

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Use of Background Data in Risk Assessments: Introductory Comments

By Jones Daniel S.  

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 9, Iss. 7, 2003-12 ,pp. : 1595-1597

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

US EPA's IRIS pilot program: establishing IRIS as a centralized, peer-reviewed data base with agency consensus

By Mills A.   Foureman G.L.  

Toxicology, Vol. 127, Iss. 1, 1998-05 ,pp. : 85-95

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite