

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1540-9309|12|7|395-402
ISSN: 1540-9295
Source: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol.12, Iss.7, 2014-09, pp. : 395-402
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The distributions of many species are dynamic in space and time, and movements made by individuals range from regular and predictable migrations to erratic, resource‐driven nomadism. Conserving such mobile species is challenging; the effectiveness of a conservation action taken at one site depends on the condition of other sites that may be geographically and politically distant (thousands of kilometers away or in another jurisdiction, for example). Recent work has shown that even simple and predictable linkages among sites caused by “to‐and‐fro” migration can make migratory species especially vulnerable to habitat loss, and substantially affect the results of conservation prioritizations. Species characterized by more erratic or nomadic movements are very difficult to protect through current conservation planning techniques, which typically view species distributions as static. However, collaborations between migration ecologists, conservation planners, and mathematical ecologists are paving the way for improvements in conservation planning for mobile species.
Related content










Competitive Interactions of Two Mobile Prey Species in a Patchy Environment
Ecology, Vol. 66, Iss. 3, 1985-06 ,pp. :