Does Stroke Severity for Repeated Thrombolysis Matter? Response to the Letter by Wu et al.

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1421-9913|75|3-4|155-156

ISSN： 0014-3022

Source： European Neurology, Vol.75, Iss.3-4, 2016-03, pp. : 155-156

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Reply to the Letter by Sharma et al: Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign and Stroke Outcomes after Intravenous Thrombolysis

By  

Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, 2010-12 ,pp. : 209-209

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Age and Stroke Severity: Hazards for Intravenous Thrombolysis?

By  

Medical Principles and Practice, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, 2016-0 ,pp. : 99-100

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Muriithi et al.'s Letter to the Editors-in-Chief

By Greilich P.E.   Brouse C.F.   Carr M.E.  

Thrombosis Research, Vol. 107, Iss. 1, 2002-07 ,pp. : 83-84

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Letter to the Editor by Eisner et al.

By Teshima Y.   Takahashi N.   Saikawa T.   Hara M.   Yasunaga S.   Hidaka S.   Sakata T.  

Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Vol. 32, Iss. 7, 2000-07 ,pp. : 1379-1379

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What Matters in the Results of Repeated Intravenous Thrombolysis for Recurrent Ischemic Stroke?

By  

European Neurology, Vol. 75, Iss. 3-4, 2016-03 ,pp. : 150-154

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite