A Prospective Randomized Study of Two Reminding Strategies: Telephone versus Mail in the Screening of Cervical Cancer in Women Who Did Not Initially Respond

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1938-2650|55|4|334-340

ISSN： 0001-5547

Source： Acta Cytologica, Vol.55, Iss.4, 2011-07, pp. : 334-340

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Who Should Decide How Effective Cervical Cancer Screening Will Be?

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, 2011-07 ,pp. : 4-6

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 41, Iss. 4, 2011-09 ,pp. : 1103-1106

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Addressing Confusion about the Risks and Benefits of Co-Testing versus Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 61, Iss. 3, 2017-05 ,pp. : 252-252

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Automation of Primary Screening for Cervical Cancer

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, 2011-07 ,pp. : 7-12

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cervical Cancer Screening, Screening Errors and Reporting

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, 2011-03 ,pp. : 493-498

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite