Biphasic versus Monophasic Shock for External Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1421-9751|111|1|57-62

ISSN： 0008-6312

Source： Cardiology, Vol.111, Iss.1, 2008-02, pp. : 57-62

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Electric cardioversion of atrial flutter in a critically ill patient in the prone position

By Fikkers B. G.   Bello C. R.   van Dijk A. P. J.  

Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 27, Iss. 2, 2001-02 ,pp. : 449-449

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Concurrent Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation during ICD Shock Testing

By  

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Vol. 38, Iss. 7, 2015-07 ,pp. : 864-869

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of first shock success of monophasic and biphasic waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

By van Alem A.P.   Chapman F.W.   Lank P.   Hart A.A.M.   Koster R.W.  

Resuscitation, Vol. 58, Iss. 1, 2003-07 ,pp. : 17-24

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Use of rate control medication before cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter in the emergency department is associated with reduced success rates

By  

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2012-05 ,pp. : 169-177

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Intracardiac Low-Energy versus Transthoracic High-Energy Direct-Current Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomised Comparison

By  

Cardiology, Vol. 99, Iss. 2, 2003-04 ,pp. : 72-77

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite